Skip to main content

compliant-web-design

Additional Compliance Measures​

To ensure compliance with regulations like GDPR and CCPA, you should also consider these practices:

  • IP Anonymization: While Google Analytics 4 (GA4) automatically anonymizes IP addresses, it's good practice to ensure this is configured and disclosed in your policy.
  • Data Retention: Set appropriate data retention periods in your Google Analytics account.
  • Cookie Consent Banner: Implement a cookie consent banner on your website that allows users to accept or reject analytics cookies before they are placed.
  • Transparent Communication: Your privacy policy should be easily accessible and written in clear, simple language. You must also notify users of any changes or updates to your policy.

"browsewrap" and "clickwrap"​

Here's a breakdown of the nuances, which you can use to guide your team and your clients:

The fundamental rule of U.S. contract law that applies here is mutual assent. For a contract to be legally binding, both parties must have a "meeting of the minds" and agree to the same terms. In the context of online agreements, this means the website user must have:

  1. Reasonable Notice of the terms.
  2. Unambiguous Manifestation of Assent to those terms.

The difference between browsewrap and clickwrap is how they attempt to satisfy these two requirements.

When Browsewrap is Sufficient (and the Nuances of its Enforceability)​

A browsewrap agreement is one where the user is deemed to have accepted the terms simply by using the website. There is no explicit action required to show agreement. Courts are highly reluctant to enforce these agreements, and they are generally considered to be "on thin ice."

However, there are very specific and narrow situations where a browsewrap agreement might be enforceable. The key is to demonstrate that the user had actual or constructive knowledge of the terms.

  • When there is actual knowledge: A browsewrap agreement can be enforced if you can prove the user had actual knowledge of the terms. This is rare and difficult to prove. For example, if the user is a sophisticated business that has a direct, repeated business relationship with your client, and they have been made explicitly aware of the terms in another communication (e.g., in an email or a cease and desist letter).
  • When there is "conspicuous" notice: Courts have occasionally upheld browsewrap agreements when the link to the terms is so prominent and conspicuous that a "reasonably prudent internet user" would have seen it. This is a high bar and heavily dependent on the court's interpretation. Factors that contribute to conspicuousness include:
    • Placement: The link must be in a highly visible location, not buried in the footer among dozens of other links.
    • Visual cues: The link should stand out through different font size, color, or use of capital letters. It must be clearly differentiated from the surrounding text.
    • Proximity to action: The link to the terms should be placed in close proximity to the button or action the user is taking (e.g., a "Download" button or a "Continue to Checkout" button). However, as seen in cases like Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., even proximity is not always enough without a clear notice.

Case Law Example: In Specht v. Netscape, the court found a browsewrap agreement unenforceable because the link to the terms was "submerged" below the download button, requiring the user to scroll down to see it. This case set an important precedent for the need for prominent notice.

Practical Takeaway for E-commerce: For your e-commerce clients, browsewrap is almost never sufficient. The legal risk is too high. A user making a purchase is a high-stakes transaction, and a court will expect a clear, affirmative agreement to the T&Cs, especially regarding things like arbitration clauses or limitations on liability.

When Clickwrap is Necessary (and Best Practices)​

A clickwrap agreement is one where the user must take an affirmative action to show their consent, such as checking a box or clicking a button. This is the gold standard for online agreements and is necessary for any e-commerce transaction or account creation where legally binding terms are required.

The enforceability of a clickwrap agreement hinges on a few key elements that you can implement in your development process:

  • Affirmative Consent: The user must actively do something to agree.
    • Required action: The user must be unable to proceed (e.g., to the checkout page or to create an account) without checking a box or clicking an "I Agree" button.
    • No pre-checked boxes: Pre-checked boxes are a major red flag and do not constitute affirmative consent.
  • Clear and Conspicuous Notice:
    • The link to the full T&Cs should be immediately visible and located directly next to the checkbox or "I Agree" button.
    • The language should be unambiguous, such as "By checking this box, you agree to the Terms & Conditions."
  • Proof of Assent: This is a crucial back-end consideration for your engineering team. To prove the agreement in court, you must be able to show:
    • Who accepted: The user's account ID or a unique identifier.
    • When they accepted: A timestamp of the click.
    • What they accepted: The exact version of the terms that was presented to the user at that time. This is especially important as terms can change over time.

Case Law Example: In ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, the court upheld a clickwrap agreement because the user, by continuing to use the software after being presented with the terms, had a clear opportunity to review the license and accept it. This case and others have consistently affirmed that clickwrap agreements, when properly implemented, are enforceable contracts.

Practical Takeaway for E-commerce: For your e-commerce clients, always use a clickwrap agreement. It is the most legally defensible method to ensure the enforceability of your T&Cs. Given your proficiency with agile methodologies, you can treat this not just as a one-time build, but as a feature of your system, ensuring that every time a user makes a purchase, their consent is documented and recorded in the back-end, creating a legally sound audit trail.

As a freelance software engineer and marketing agency owner specializing in web development, you understand the importance of clear legal documentation for your e-commerce clients. The question of U.S. case law is particularly relevant, as it provides guidance where statutes may be vague.

Here's a breakdown of the U.S. legal landscape for e-commerce websites regarding privacy notices, T&Cs, and WCAG accessibility statements, based on case law and legal precedent, and specifically excluding ADA compliance, as you requested.

That's an excellent and precise legal question. The relationship between this language and the method of presentation is crucial.

The phrase "PLEASE READ THESE TERMS OF USE BEFORE USING" is a powerful tool that is most effective when used with clickwrap, but it is most necessary when used with browsewrap.

Here’s the breakdown:

1. With Clickwrap (The Gold Standard)​

  • Role of the Phrase: In a classic clickwrap scenario, the phrase acts as a supplemental reinforcement of the user's unambiguous assent.
  • How it works: You are presented with the terms (often in a scrollable text box) and the phrase "Please read before using" or "I agree" is placed directly next to an "I Agree" button that the user must click to proceed.
  • Legal Effect: The click is the clear act of assent. The "please read" language simply bolsters the argument that the user was given a reasonable opportunity to review the terms, making the agreement virtually bulletproof. The phrase is helpful but not strictly necessary here because the click is such strong evidence of agreement.

2. With Browsewrap (Where It Becomes Critical)​

  • Role of the Phrase: In a pure browsewrap scenario, where terms are merely linked at the bottom of a page without an "I agree" button, this phrase shifts from being supplemental to being the primary mechanism for providing notice.
  • How it works: The phrase itself, especially if placed prominently at the top of a page or in a pop-up banner (e.g., "By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use"), is intended to put the user on inquiry notice. It screams, "There are rules here, and your use means you accept them."
  • Legal Effect: This is where the phrase does the heavy lifting. Courts are skeptical of browsewrap agreements because they rely on constructive notice (we presume you saw it) rather than actual notice (you clicked it). A prominent "Please read before using" warning is a key factor courts analyze to decide if the notice was conspicuous enough to be reasonable.

Feasibility and Court Scrutiny​

The phrase makes a browsewrap-style argument more feasible, but it does not guarantee enforceability. Courts will look at the totality of the circumstances:

  • Conspicuity: How obvious was the warning? Was it in a large font, a contrasting color, or at the top of the page where a user couldn't miss it? Or was it buried in small, grey text at the very bottom?
  • Context: The Dunkin' example is strong because it's in ALL CAPS at the very beginning of the legal document itself. However, for it to function as browsewrap, the link to the terms on the website must also be conspicuous. A user must be able to easily find the terms they are being urged to read.
  • User Action: Did the user take some action that implies agreement? While not a click, prolonged use of a service, signing up for an account, or making a purchase after being exposed to this language can be construed as "assent by conduct."

Conclusion: A Spectrum of Enforceability​

Think of it as a spectrum:

  • Most Enforceable: Clickwrap with "Please Read" language. (Unambiguous assent + clear notice)
  • Highly Enforceable: Clickwrap without "Please Read" language. (Unambiguous assent)
  • Potentially Enforceable: Browsewrap with prominent "Please Read" language. (The language provides the conspicuous notice browsewrap lacks)
  • Least Enforceable: Browsewrap without prominent "Please Read" language. (Terms linked obscurely at the bottom of a page with no warning)

In summary: The phrase "PLEASE READ BEFORE USING" is not required for clickwrap, but it makes the agreement even stronger. For browsewrap, it is a critical and necessary component to have any feasible chance of enforceability, as it provides the conspicuous notice that browsewrap agreements otherwise lack. Dunkin' is using this strong language to create a robust hybrid agreement that leans on the principles of browsewrap (use constitutes assent) but is backed by the level of notice typically associated with clickwrap.