Skip to main content

Litigation

process of resolving a dispute between two parties. Court trial, Discovery phase, post-trial appeals.

Although I cannot generate a visual diagram, I can provide a comprehensive, step-by-step description of the phases of litigation, similar to a flowchart.

1. Pre-Litigation​

This phase occurs before a lawsuit is officially filed.

  • Dispute Arises: A disagreement occurs, such as a breach of contract or an injury.
  • Investigation: The parties and their attorneys gather information, review documents, and assess the merits of a potential case.
  • Negotiation & Settlement: The parties may attempt to resolve the dispute through direct talks, mediation, or arbitration to avoid the expense and time of a formal lawsuit. Many cases are settled at this stage.

2. Pleadings​

This is the official start of the lawsuit.

  • Complaint: The plaintiff files a formal document (the complaint) with the court, which outlines the factual and legal basis for their claim against the defendant.
  • Service of Process: The defendant is formally notified of the lawsuit by being served with a copy of the complaint and a summons.
  • Answer: The defendant files a response (the answer), admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint and potentially raising their own counterclaims.
  • Motions: Either party may file motions to ask the court to take a specific action, such as a "motion to dismiss" if they believe the complaint is legally flawed.

3. Discovery​

This is often the longest phase of litigation, where both sides gather information and evidence.

  • Interrogatories: Written questions are sent to the opposing party, who must answer them under oath.
  • Requests for Production: Parties request documents, emails, texts, and other tangible evidence from one another.
  • Depositions: Witnesses and parties are questioned under oath in an out-of-court setting, with a court reporter present to create a transcript.
  • Motions to Compel: If a party refuses to cooperate with discovery, the other party can file a motion asking the court to order them to comply.

4. Pre-Trial​

  • Summary Judgment: A party may file a "motion for summary judgment" to ask the court to rule in their favor without a trial, arguing that there are no disputed facts and the law is clearly on their side.
  • Final Negotiations: Settlement discussions often continue, sometimes with the help of a judge or a mediator.
  • Trial Preparation: If the case does not settle, both sides prepare their final arguments, organize evidence, and select witnesses for the trial.

5. Trial​

This is the courtroom phase, which relatively few cases actually reach.

  • Jury Selection: A jury is selected (if applicable) through a process called voir dire.
  • Opening Statements: Both sides give a summary of the facts and what they intend to prove.
  • Presentation of Evidence: Witnesses are called to testify and are cross-examined. Documents and other evidence are presented to the judge or jury.
  • Closing Arguments: Both sides summarize their case and persuade the judge or jury to rule in their favor.
  • Verdict & Judgment: The jury or judge delivers a verdict, and the court enters a final judgment based on that decision.

6. Post-Trial & Appeals​

This phase occurs after a judgment has been rendered.

  • Post-Trial Motions: The losing party can ask the trial judge to change the verdict.
  • Appeals: If the losing party believes there was a legal error, they can appeal the case to a higher court. This process can take a long time and does not involve new evidence, but rather a review of the trial court's record.

"Forum shopping" is the strategic practice of a party to a lawsuit choosing a court that it believes will provide a more favorable outcome. This is done by exploiting differences in the laws, legal procedures, or judicial tendencies of various jurisdictions where the case could be filed. The goal is to gain an advantage, such as a more sympathetic jury, higher potential damages, or more favorable legal precedents.

Here are 15 more strategies a party might use in litigation, beyond just "forum shopping," to gain an advantage. These are tactics used to influence the process, the evidence, or the opposing party.

  1. Strategic Default: Deliberately failing to respond to a lawsuit in the hope that the plaintiff will not follow through with obtaining a default judgment. It's a high-risk tactic, but it can be used to delay a case or even avoid it entirely if the other party is not diligent.

  2. Motions for Summary Judgment: Filing a motion asking the court to rule in your favor without a trial because there are no material facts in dispute. The strategy is to show that even if the other side's facts are true, their claim still fails as a matter of law, thus avoiding the cost and risk of a full trial.

  3. Abusive Discovery: Using the legal discovery process (requests for documents, interrogatories, depositions) to harass the opposing party. This can include making overly broad or burdensome requests to increase the other side's legal costs and pressure them into a settlement.

  4. Motions in Limine: Filing motions before trial to exclude certain evidence or testimony from being presented to the jury. The strategy is to prevent the jury from hearing damaging information, such as prior bad acts, that could prejudice them against your client.

  5. Seeking an Injunction: Asking the court for an order that requires the opposing party to do something or, more often, to stop doing something. This is a powerful, time-sensitive strategy used to protect a business interest (e.g., stopping a competitor from using your trademark) while the main lawsuit is pending.

  6. Mediation/Settlement Offer Strategy: Making a very low initial settlement offer to test the waters, or a high one that signals strength and willingness to fight. Another common strategy is making a settlement offer just before a major court event to get the opposing party to settle while under pressure.

  7. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: A preliminary motion filed at the very beginning of a lawsuit, arguing that even if everything the plaintiff alleges is true, they still haven't stated a valid legal cause of action. The strategy is to knock the lawsuit out early before incurring significant legal costs.

  8. Choosing a "Soft" Target: In a lawsuit involving multiple defendants, a plaintiff may strategically choose to settle with a "soft" defendant (one who is more likely to settle) to gain leverage and funds to continue the case against the "harder" defendant.

  9. Controlling the Narrative: Shaping how the dispute is perceived by the public, the court, and the opposing party. This can involve strategic press releases, public statements, or even the careful wording of court filings to frame the facts in a way that favors your client.

  10. Delay Tactics: Intentionally prolonging the legal process through various procedural maneuvers. The goal is to wear down the opposing party, who may have limited resources, and force them to settle. This is a common strategy against individuals or small businesses.

  11. Disputing Venue or Jurisdiction: Filing a motion to dismiss a case by arguing that the court where the suit was filed is an improper venue or lacks personal jurisdiction over your client. This is a common first step after being sued in an inconvenient location.

  12. Using Expert Witnesses: Retaining and strategically using expert witnesses (e.g., forensic accountants, industry analysts, or medical professionals) to provide favorable testimony and bolster your legal arguments. The goal is to provide credibility and technical support for your case.

  13. "Blame the Victim" or "Sow Doubt" Strategy: Shifting the blame to the opposing party or creating enough confusion about the facts that a jury becomes unsure of the truth. This is a powerful strategy, particularly in cases where the evidence is not cut-and-dry.

  14. Protective Orders: Requesting the court to limit the sharing of sensitive business information during the discovery process. The strategy is to protect trade secrets or other confidential data from falling into the hands of a competitor.

  15. Consolidation/Separation of Claims: In a lawsuit with multiple claims, a party may ask the court to consolidate claims that are favorable to them or to separate claims that are not. For example, if two lawsuits share common facts, one party may seek to consolidate them to make the proceedings more efficient.