Skip to main content

UI Libraries

Bootstrap is obsolete

colors​

colors

Meme

Tailwinds​

2025​

https://www.cosmic-ui.com/ https://github.com/rizkimuhammada/cosmic-ui

CSS Frameworks / UI Library​

https://picnicss.com/documentation https://tachyons.io/ http://augmented-ui.com/

img

src

Comparison of angular UI libraries​

Here is the comparison between Angular Material and ng-bootstrap based on their popularity, activity, and general observations:

Angular Material​

Popularity & Activity​

Pros​

  1. Official Angular Integration: Developed by the Angular team, ensuring seamless integration with Angular projects.
  2. Material Design Compliance: Provides fully compliant Material Design components, ensuring consistency in UI/UX.
  3. Active Community: Large community and extensive documentation.
  4. Long-term Support: Backed by the Angular team, indicating strong long-term support.

Cons​

  1. Limited Customization: Sticks strictly to Material Design principles, which can make customization challenging if you want to deviate from the design language.
  2. Learning Curve: Requires familiarity with Material Design for effective use.

ng-bootstrap​

Popularity & Activity​

Pros​

  1. Bootstrap Integration: Provides Angular-powered components based on Bootstrap, making it an excellent choice for developers already familiar with Bootstrap.
  2. Lightweight: Focused on providing essential UI components without unnecessary overhead.
  3. Customizability: Allows customization within the Bootstrap framework.

Cons​

  1. Limited Component Library: Compared to Angular Material, it has a narrower range of pre-built components.
  2. Third-Party Dependency: Relies on Bootstrap, which may limit flexibility when deviating from the Bootstrap ecosystem.

Comparison​

FeatureAngular Materialng-bootstrap
Stars24,6608,244
Forks6,8061,561
Open Issues2,083410
Community SupportLarger, Angular-backedSmaller but active
ComponentsMaterial Design-based componentsBootstrap-based components
CustomizationLimited, strict Material DesignFlexible within Bootstrap
Long-term SupportStrong (backed by Angular team)Promising but less guarantee

PrimeNG​

Popularity & Activity​

Pros​

  1. Extensive Component Library: Offers a larger library of components compared to Angular Material, including advanced components like charts, data grids, and more.
  2. Customizability: More flexibility in design and theming.
  3. Wide Use Cases: Suitable for both simple and highly complex enterprise applications.

Cons​

  1. Third-Party Dependency: Not officially tied to Angular, which may raise concerns about long-term alignment with Angular updates.
  2. Inconsistent Documentation: Some users report that the documentation can be confusing or incomplete.

Comparison​

FeatureAngular MaterialPrimeNG
Stars24,66011,414
Forks6,8064,816
Open Issues2,083712
Community SupportLarger, Angular-backedSmaller but active
ComponentsFocused on Material DesignExtensive and varied
CustomizabilityLimitedHigh
Long-term SupportStrong (backed by Angular team)Promising but not guaranteed

Conclusion​

  • Choose ng-bootstrap if:

    • You are already using Bootstrap or prefer its design language.
    • You want a lightweight library focused on essential components.

  • Choose Angular Material if:

    • You want a library that adheres strictly to Material Design.
    • You need long-term support and stability backed by the Angular team.
    • You are building applications where Material Design is a priority.

  • Choose PrimeNG if:

    • You need a broader range of components for complex applications.
    • Customizability and visual flexibility are important to your project.
    • You don't mind relying on a third-party library for Angular UI.